Comparative Metagenomic Analysis of Chicken Gut Microbial Community, Function, and Resistome to Evaluate Noninvasive and Cecal Sampling Resources

文献类型： 外文期刊

第一作者： Kang, Kelang

作者： Kang, Kelang;Hu, Yan;Wu, Shu;Shi, Shourong;Hu, Yan;Shi, Shourong;Hu, Yan;Shi, Shourong

作者机构：

关键词： metagenome; bacterial community; resistome; sampling resources; chickens

期刊名称：ANIMALS （ 影响因子：2.752； 五年影响因子：2.942 ）

ISSN： 2076-2615

年卷期： 2021 年 11 卷 6 期

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： Simple Summary Normally, researchers use feces or rectal swabs to characterize a gut microbiome, but because there is significant spatiotemporal variation across different intestinal segments there are marked differences in composition and function of microbiomes among various gut sites. Hence, a consensus has not been reached on the location for sampling for gut microbial metagenome sequencing. This study provides a comparative perspective on gut microbial function that takes into account different sampling resources when conducting a metagenomic sequence analysis, highlighting the differences in the choice of a gut microbiome sampling site, and investigating whether feces and rectal swab samples are efficient proxies for gut microbiome sampling. When conducting metagenomic analysis on gut microbiomes, there is no general consensus concerning the mode of sampling: non-contact (feces), noninvasive (rectal swabs), or cecal. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and comparative merits and disadvantages of using fecal samples or rectal swabs as a proxy for the cecal microbiome. Using broiler as a model, gut microbiomes were obtained from cecal, cloacal, and fecal samples and were characterized according to an analysis of the microbial community, function, and resistome. Cecal samples had higher microbial diversity than feces, while the cecum and cloaca exhibited higher levels of microbial community structure similarity compared with fecal samples. Cecal microbiota possessed higher levels of DNA replicative viability than feces, while fecal microbiota were correlated with increased metabolic activity. When feces were excreted, the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes like tet and ErmG decreased, but some antibiotic genes became more prevalent, such as fexA, tetL, and vatE. Interestingly, Lactobacillus was a dominant bacterial genus in feces that led to differences in microbial community structure, metabolism, and resistome. In conclusion, fecal microbiota have limited potential as a proxy in chicken gut microbial community studies. Thus, feces should be used with caution for characterizing gut microbiomes by metagenomic analysis.

分类号：

  • 相关文献
作者其他论文 更多>>

微信小程序