The effects of biochar and hoggery biogas slurry on fluvo-aquic soil physical and hydraulic properties: a field study of four consecutive wheat-maize rotations

文献类型: 外文期刊

第一作者: Du, Zhenjie

作者: Du, Zhenjie;Chen, Xiaomin;Nan, Jiangkuan;Deng, Jianqiang;Du, Zhenjie;Qi, Xuebin;Li, Zhongyang;Du, Zhenjie;Qi, Xuebin;Li, Zhongyang

作者机构:

关键词: Biochar;Hoggery biogas slurry;Soil aggregate;Saturated hydraulic conductivity;Water-holding capacity

期刊名称:JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS ( 影响因子:3.308; 五年影响因子:3.586 )

ISSN: 1439-0108

年卷期: 2016 年 16 卷 8 期

页码:

收录情况: SCI

摘要: The degeneration of fluvo-aquic soils due to long-term excessive fertilization is increasing in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, China. Products from crop straw and livestock breeding wastewater, biochar, and biogas slurry provide safe and efficient biomass resources for soil quality improvement. We assumed that biochar and biogas slurry could improve soil structure and soil water retention capacity for their special characteristics. The present study aimed to compare the effects of biochar and hoggery biogas slurry treatments on improvements to soil physical properties and water-holding capacity, and their different driving mechanisms. This study was based on a field experiment of four consecutive winter wheat-summer maize rotations on the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, China. Using the principle of equal nitrogen inputs, three treatments were conducted: conventional farming fertilizers, biochar, and hoggery biogas slurry. The differences in indicators such as soil bulk density, total porosity, aggregate structure, saturated hydraulic conductivity, and hydraulic property parameters between different treatments were compared and analyzed. The driving factors generating these differences were also discussed. Compared to conventional fertilization, soil bulk density decreased under biochar and hoggery biogas slurry treatments, whereas soil total porosity increased after hoggery biogas slurry treatment. In the 0-20-cm soil layer, biochar treatment increased the content of > 2-mm macrosoil aggregates and hoggery biogas slurry treatment increased the content of 0.25-0.5 or 1-2-mm soil aggregates. The soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in the 0-20-cm soil layer did not change significantly with biochar application, but increased with hoggery biogas slurry treatment. The application of biochar and hoggery biogas slurry improved the water-holding capacity, increasing the field capacity by 15.34 and 13.83 %, and the available water content by 16.20 and 25.87 %, respectively, in the 0-20-cm soil layer. Both biochar and hoggery biogas slurry treatments significantly improved soil structure and water-holding capacity. Biogas slurry treatment significantly increased soil saturated hydraulic conductivity, soil aggregate content, while biochar treatment significantly decreased bulk density and increased total porosity of the soil.

分类号:

  • 相关文献

[1]Effects of Biochar and Super Absorbent Polymer on Substrate Properties and Water Spinach Growth. Fan Ruqin,Luo Jia,Yan Shaohua,Zhou Yunlai,Zhang Zhenhua,Zhang Zhenhua. 2015

[2]Contribution of Heterotrophic Nitrification to Nitrous Oxide Production in a Long-Term N-Fertilized Arable Black Soil. Cai, Yanjiang,Wang, Lianfeng,Cai, Yanjiang,Ding, Weixin,Yu, Hongyan,Wang, Lianfeng,Zhang, Xilin.

[3]Effects of Straw Returning on Soil Enzyme Activity and Stability of Soil Aggregates in Flue-cured Tobacco Field. Zhang, Ji-Guang,Bo, Guo-Dong,Zhang, Zhong-Feng,Shen, Guo-Ming,Gao, Lin,Yu, Hui-Yong,Xu, Jia-Lai,Wang, Yi. 2015

[4]Differences in soil organic carbon stocks and fraction distributions between rice paddies and upland cropping systems in China. Huang, Shan,Pan, Xiaohua,Guo, Jia,Qian, Chunrong,Zhang, Weijian. 2014

[5]Stable isotope fractionation provides information on carbon dynamics in soil aggregates subjected to different long-term fertilization practices. Liu, Yi,Wang, Li,Li, Zhiguo,Pan, Junfeng,Chen, Fang,Liu, Yi,Hu, Cheng,Hu, Wei. 2018

[6]Effect of Biochars from Rice Husk, Bran, and Straw on Heavy Metal Uptake by Pot-Grown Wheat Seedling in a Historically Contaminated Soil. Zheng, Ruilun,Xiao, Bo,Chen, Zheng,Wang, Xiaohui,Huang, Yizong,Sun, Guoxin,Cai, Chao. 2013

[7]Biochar Improves Sugarcane Seedling Root and Soil Properties Under a Pot Experiment. Li, Yangrui,Yang, Liu,Li, Yangrui,Yang, Liu,Li, Yangrui,Liao, Fen,Huang, Min,Yang, Litao. 2015

[8]Comparative Effects of Biochar, Slag and Ferrous-Mn Ore on Lead and Cadmium Immobilization in Soil. Mehmood, Sajid,Rizwan, Muhammad,Bashir, Saqib,Aziz, Omar,Yong, Li Zhe,Dai, Zhihua,Tu, Shuxin,Ditta, Allah,Akmal, Muhammad,Ahmed, Waqas,Adeel, Muhammad,Imtiaz, Muhammad. 2018

[9]Effects of Biochar Amendment on Chloropicrin Adsorption and Degradation in Soil. Wang, Qiuxia,Yan, Dongdong,Fang, Wensheng,Mao, Liangang,Li, Yuan,Ouyang, Canbin,Guo, Meixia,Cao, Aocheng,Wang, Dong. 2016

[10]The Effect of Two Types of Biochars on the Efficacy, Emission, Degradation, and Adsorption of the Fumigant Methyl Isothiocyanate. Cao, Aocheng,Yan, Dongdong,Han, Dawei,Huang, Bin,Li, Jun,Liu, Xiaoman,Guo, Meixia,Wang, Qiuxia. 2017

[11]Population and community structure shifts of ammonia oxidizers after four-year successive biochar application to agricultural acidic and alkaline soils. He, Lili,Bi, Yucui,Zhao, Jin,Zhao, Xu,Wang, Shenqiang,Xing, Guangxi,He, Lili,Pittelkow, Cameron M.. 2018

[12]Preparation and Characterization of Camellia Shell Biochar. Qin, Zuodong,Li, Zhizhang,Wang, Meifeng,Duns, Gregory J.,He, Fulin,Luo, Xiaofang,Qin, Zuodong,Qin, Zuodong,Wang, Jianhua,Yang, Shengmao,Wang, Yuying,Zeng, Weixi,Yang, Shengmao,Wang, Yuying,Zeng, Weixi. 2016

[13]Bioremediation of Wastewater by Iron Oxide-Biochar Nanocomposites Loaded with Photosynthetic Bacteria. He, Shiying,Duan, Jingjing,Feng, Yanfang,Yang, Bei,Yang, Linzhang,Zhong, Linghao. 2017

[14]Selective removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from soil washing effluents using biochars produced at different pyrolytic temperatures. Li, Helian,Qu, Ronghui,Li, Chao,Guo, Weilin,Han, Xuemei,He, Fang,Ma, Yibing,Li, Helian,Xing, Baoshan,Ma, Yibing.

[15]LS-SVM data mining analysis: how does biochar influence soil net nitrogen mineralization in the field?. Deng, Jianqiang,Chen, Xiaomin,Nan, Jiangkuan,Du, Zhenjie,Deng, Jianqiang,Wang, Rui,Du, Zhenjie.

[16]Sorption of mercury (II) and atrazine by biochar, modified biochars and biochar based activated carbon in aqueous solution. Tan, Guangcai,Xu, Yaru,Xu, Nan,Sun, Weiling,Wang, Hongyuan.

[17]Selected dark sides of biomass-derived biochars as environmental amendments. Chen, Zien,Luo, Lei,Xiao, Diyi,Lv, Jitao,Wen, Bei,Zhang, Shuzhen,Ma, Yibing.

[18]Tobacco bacterial wilt suppression with biochar soil addition associates to improved soil physiochemical properties and increased rhizosphere bacteria abundance. Zhang, Chengsheng,Tian, Xueying,Lin, Yong,Xu, Qian,Chen, Zhihou,Lin, Wei.

[19]Short-term effects of maize residue biochar on phosphorus availability in two soils with different phosphorus sorption capacities. Zhai, Limei,CaiJi, Zhuoma,Liu, Jian,Wang, Hongyuan,Gai, Xiapu,Xi, Bin,Liu, Hongbin,CaiJi, Zhuoma,Liu, Jian,Ren, Tianzhi.

[20]Bioavailability assessment of thiacloprid in soil as affected by biochar. Zhu, Yulong,Liu, Xingang,Wu, Xiaohu,Dong, Fengshou,Xu, Jun,Zheng, Yongquan.

作者其他论文 更多>>