Predicting rectal temperature and respiration rate responses in lactating dairy cows exposed to heat stress

文献类型: 外文期刊

第一作者: Li, Gan

作者: Li, Gan;Chen, Siyu;Chen, Jian;Peng, Dandan;Gu, Xianhong

作者机构:

关键词: dairy cow; heat stress; predictive model; thermal environment factor

期刊名称:JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE ( 影响因子:4.034; 五年影响因子:4.354 )

ISSN: 0022-0302

年卷期: 2020 年 103 卷 6 期

页码:

收录情况: SCI

摘要: Milk production and time effects are considered related to heat stress but they have not yet been combined in predictive models. In two parts, this study aimed to develop new models to predict heat stress (rectal temperature and respiration rate) of lactating dairy cows by inputting predictors, including ambient temperature (T-a), relative humidity (RH), wind speed (WS), milk yield (MY), and time blocks. In the first part of the study, we built the quantitative foundation for the second part, including the regression relation between respiration rate and rectal temperature (to convert predicted respiration rate to predicted body temperature), as well as between rectal temperature and respiration rate when heat stress was triggered (to recognize whether herds were under stress). In the second part, we built models that combined the above-mentioned predictors to predict respiration rate. In part I, data were obtained from 45 high-producing Holstein cows within a T-a range of 9.5 to 30.8 degrees C. We found a very strong correlation between mean respiration rate (MRR) and mean rectal temperature (MRT), where MRT = 0.021 x MRR + 37.6 (R-2 = 0.925), suggesting that for each 4.8 breaths per minute (bpm) increase of MRR, MRT would be expected to increase by 0.1 degrees C. Rectal temperature was determined to be 38.6 degrees C when heat stress was triggered, which corresponded to a respiration rate of 48 bpm. In part II, data were obtained in 3 stalls within a T-a range of 6.9 to 33.3 degrees C over 3 time blocks, all of which were the 90 min preceding milking (0630-0800, 1230-1400, and 1830-2000 h). We found a nonlinear response of MRR to T-a, which could be linearized by the quadratic term of T-a. The response of MRR was the highest in the 0630-0800 h block, followed by 1230-1400 h, and finally 1830-2000 h. We proposed a model combining 3 time blocks (R-2 = 0.836): MRR in 0630-0800 h was determined to 56.28 + (-3.40 + 0.11 x T-a + 0.02 x RH) x T-a - 0.21 x RH - 2.82 x WS + 0.62 x MY; MRR in 1230-1400 h and 1830-2000 h were 4.6 and 10.3 bpm lower than that in 0630-0800 h, respectively (reducing the intercept of the expression in 0630-0800 h). Compared with temperature-humidity index equations, the proposed model performed better at suppressing prediction error, and had better sensitivity and accuracy in recognizing whether heat stress was triggered.

分类号:

  • 相关文献
作者其他论文 更多>>