您好，欢迎访问北京市农林科学院 机构知识库！
北京市农林科学院机构知识库

全部

  • 全部
  • 标题
  • 学者
  • 机构
  • 关键词

Effects of Different Nitrogen Types on Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Field Water Quality, and Soil Microbial Community in the Rice-Crayfish Co-Culture System

文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Huang, Fei 1 ; Yang, Shuo 1 ; Nie, Xibin 1 ; Li, Jintao 1 ; Hu, Yang 1 ; Li, Xuan 1 ; Ding, Zijuan 1 ; Hou, Jun 1 ; Wang, Xuexia 3 ;

作者机构： 1.Yangtze Univ, Coll Agr, Engn Res Ctr Ecol & Agr Use Wetland, Minist Educ, 88-2 Jingmi Rd, Jingzhou 434025, Hubei, Peoples R China

2.Yangtze Univ, Coll Life Sci, 88-2 Jingmi Rd, Jingzhou 434025, Hubei, Peoples R China

3.Beijing Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Inst Plant Nutr Resources & Environm, 11 Shuguang Huayuan Zhong Rd, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China

4.Beijing Engn Technol Res Ctr Slow Controlled Relea, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China

关键词： Field water quality nitrogen types; Nitrogen use efficiency; Rice-crayfish co-culture system; Soil microbial community; Rice yield

期刊名称：JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION （ 影响因子：3.9； 五年影响因子：3.9 ）

ISSN： 0718-9508

年卷期： 2023 年 23 卷 2 期

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： PurposeThe rice-crayfish co-culture system (RCS) has developed rapidly in recent years due to its highly comprehensive benefits in China. A 2-year RCS experiment was carried out to assess the N types suitable.MethodsThe following four treatments were implemented in a paddy field: (1) no N fertilizer (CK), (2) base fertilizer as compound fertilizer and topdressing urea (CF), (3) slow-release compound fertilizer (CRF), and (4) base fertilizer as organic-inorganic compound fertilizer and topdressing urea (OF), and rice growth, soil conditions, and field surface water quality were measured.ResultsThe yield, N fertilizer agronomic efficiency, N partial production efficiency, and N use efficiency of rice in CRF significantly increased by 8.8%-14.3%, 44.2%-64.9%, 13.6%-15.0%, and 30.8%-39.2%, respectively compared with CF. Meanwhile, CRF improved the N accumulation of rice and the soil NH4+-N content in the full heading stage, while OF improved soil urease and catalase activities in the rice growth period compared with CF and CRF. No significant differences were found in the bacterial diversity under different N varieties. CRF had the best effect in terms of reducing NH4+-N and NO3--N concentrations at the lowest level.ConclusionsEven though the cost of CRF was significantly higher, CRF still had the highest net income, and CRF and OF had higher net income compared with CF. A comprehensive analysis of rice yield, surface water quality, and NUE found that CRF was the best choice in RCS, and eco-friendly controlled-release fertilizer should be encouraged.

  • 相关文献
作者其他论文 更多>>
置顶
购物车
反馈

© 京ICP备09089781号-29 主办单位：北京市农林科学院

学术资源： 中国农业科学院 农业专业知识服务系统 农科联盟资源共建共享平台 中国农业科技文献与信息服务平台 中国农业期刊集成服务平台