文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Wang, Taoni ¹ ; Fan, Ruiliang ¹ ; Cheng, Qiqun ³ ; Sun, Zhaoyue ¹ ; Fan, Xiumei ³ ; Li, Nannan ¹ ; Li, Xueying ¹ ; Quan, ¹ ;

作者机构： 1.Chinese Acad Fishery Sci, East China Sea Fisheries Res Inst, Key Lab East China Sea Fishery Resources Exploita, Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, 300 Jungon Rd, Shanghai 200090, Peoples R China

2.Shanghai Oceanog Univ, Fishery & Life Sci Coll, 999 Huchenghuan Rd, Shanghai 201300, Peoples R China

3.Chinese Acad Fishery Sci, Key Lab Ocean & Polar Fisheries, Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, East China Sea Fisheries Res Inst, 300 Jungon Rd, Shanghai 200090, Peoples R China

关键词： oyster; Crassostrea sikamea; Crassostrea ariakensis; exposure; larvae; molecular; stressor; China

期刊名称：JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH （ 影响因子：1.396； 五年影响因子：1.47 ）

ISSN： 0730-8000

年卷期： 2020 年 39 卷 1 期

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： The Suminoe oyster Crassostrea ariakensis and the Kumamoto oyster Crassostrea sikamea coexist and are habitat-forming ecosystem engineers in the Yangtze River estuary and its adjacent coasts. To date, little quantitative information is available on the intertidal zonation patterns of these two oysters within their native range or on the related mechanisms generating these spatial patterns. This study first carried out field surveys and laboratory experiments to explore the vertical zonation patterns of the two oysters in the intertidal habitats of northern Hangzhou Bay. assess the roles of abiotic (aerial exposure stress) and biotic (larval distribution, recruitment, and competition) factors in regulating vertical zonation and understand their driving mechanisms. At the study site, C. sikamea dominated the higher intertidal zone (approximately 6.7 h and 56% emersion/12 h tidal cycle), whereas C. ariakensis occupied the three deeper intertidal zones (mid, mid-low, and low intertidal). Mean aerial exposures of 56% and 42% represented the optimal growth zones and the lower limits of C. sikamea, respectively. The growth boundary of the two oysters was located in the intertidal zone that was exposed 42% of the time. The area with the highest C. ariakensis densities (the optimal growth zone) was the mid-low intertidal (mean: 3.0 h and 25% emersion/tidal cycle). In a laboratory 72-h aerial exposure experiment, the percentage of water loss was significantly greater for C. ariakensis than for C. sikamea after 24 h (P < 0.01), which was also supported by the result that C. ariakensis had a relatively greater dry tissue weight and lower water weight of soft tissue than C. sikamea (P < 0.001). The results from the real-time quantitative PCR examining the oyster larvae abundances found that C. sikamea and C. ariakensis larvae dominated the surface and bottom layers of water, respectively. Oyster recruits were significantly more abundant in the low intertidal zone (380.2 +/- 48.6 spats/400 cm(2)) than in the high intertidal zone (153.2 +/- 45.9 spats/400 cm(2)) (P < 0.05), whereas the mortality of the oyster spats recruited to the experimental plates did not differ between the high and low intertidal zones (P > 0.05). Twenty-two individuals among the 30 oyster recruits (73%) in the high intertidal region were identified as C. sikamea, and six recruits (20%) were identified as C. ariakensis. All 36 recruits (100%) in the low intertidal region were identified as C. ariakensis. It was concluded that the differential larval distribution, settlement, and post-settlement mortality along the intertidal elevation gradients served as a mechanism for vertical zonation of these two oyster species.