您好，欢迎访问北京市农林科学院 机构知识库！
北京市农林科学院机构知识库

全部

  • 全部
  • 标题
  • 学者
  • 机构
  • 关键词

Reducing nitrogen pollution while improving tomato production by controlled-release urea application

文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Yang, Jungang 1 ; Liao, Shangqiang 1 ; Li, Yanmei 1 ; Cao, Bing 1 ; Sun, Yanxin 1 ; Zou, Guoyuan 1 ; Liu, Baocun 1 ;

作者机构： 1.Beijing Acad Agr & Forest Sci, MOA, Key Lab Urban Agr North, Inst Plant Nutr & Resource, Beijing, Peoples R China

2.Beijing Engn Technol Res Ctr Slow Controlled Rele, Beijing, Peoples R China

关键词： Single application; nitrate leaching; N2O emissions; greenhouse tomato system

期刊名称：SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION （ 影响因子：2.389； 五年影响因子：2.525 ）

ISSN： 0038-0768

年卷期： 2018 年 64 卷 5 期

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： Considerable nitrogen (N) losses from intensive vegetable systems have become an important source of environmental damage. A high-efficiency N application to minimize N pollution and improve production is urgently needed. Here, we conducted field experiments to identify the effects of a single application of controlled-release urea (CRU), conventional urea (CU), and chicken manure (CM) on N losses and yields improvement in a greenhouse tomato system in Beijing, China. Five treatments were carried out: no N control (CK), lower rate of CRU with CU and CM (CRN1), medium rate of CRU with CU and CM (CRN2), higher rate of CRU with CU and CM (CRN3), and conventional fertilization (CN). The results showed that the single application of CRU, CU, and CM reduced the nitrate N concentration and N2O emissions by 22 to 79% and 39 to 51%, respectively, compared with the conventional fertilization . Based on the N application rate, the average nitrate N concentration showed an exponential increase, and the cumulative N2O emissions showed a linear increase. Compared to the CN treatment, the CRN1, CRN2, and CRN3 treatments decreased fertilization cost by 44%, 22%, and 3.4%, while raising yields by 9.6%, 17%, and 2.0%, respectively. The apparent N surplus of the CRN1 and CRN2 treatments was reduced by 39% and 13% relative to the CN treatment, whereas the CRN3 treatment was as high as that of the CN treatment. It can be concluded that applying CRU, CU, and CM at the higher rate hardly improved the yield but increased the risk of N losses, whereas the lower and medium rates of CRU could reduce N pollution and improve production. The CRN2 treatment, reducing the CRU rate by 25%, with the highest economic efficiency, was the best choice to achieve greater yields with less environmental impacts in greenhouse tomato systems.Abbreviations: CRU, controlled-release urea; CU, conventional urea; CM, chicken manure; DAT, days after transplanting.

  • 相关文献
作者其他论文 更多>>
置顶
购物车
反馈

© 京ICP备09089781号-29 主办单位：北京市农林科学院

学术资源： 中国农业科学院 农业专业知识服务系统 农科联盟资源共建共享平台 中国农业科技文献与信息服务平台 中国农业期刊集成服务平台