您好，欢迎访问江苏省农业科学院 机构知识库！
江苏省农业科学院机构知识库

全部

  • 全部
  • 标题
  • 学者
  • 机构
  • 关键词

Performance evaluation of mechanical blossom thinning in trunk type pear orchard

文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Lei, Xiaohui 1 ; Lyu, Xiaolan 1 ; Zhang, Meina 1 ; Lu, Daipeng 1 ; Wang, Shilin 1 ; Chang, Youhong 1 ; Zhong, Dexin 2 ; S 1 ;

作者机构： 1.Jiangsu Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Facil & Equipment, Key Lab Protected Agr Engn Middle & Lower Reaches, Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, Peoples R China

2.Pubei Agr Machinery Technol Extens Stn, Qinzhou 535300, Guangxi, Peoples R China

3.Tianjin Agr Dev Serv Ctr, Tianjin 300061, Peoples R China

关键词： mechanical blossom thinning; pear orchard; trunk type; performance evaluation

期刊名称：INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING （ 影响因子：2.032； 五年影响因子：2.137 ）

ISSN： 1934-6344

年卷期： 2021 年 14 卷 4 期

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： In order to yield a marketable product, hand fruit thinning (HFT) has become the major but costly management practice in modern pear planting. Two kinds of new blossom thinners for pear blossom thinning were developed, which are tractor-mounted three arms blossom thinner (TTBT) and hand-held electric blossom thinner (HEBT). Four treatments for 24 trunk type 'Cuiguan' pear trees (7 years) were tested. They are TTBT combined with HFT, HEBT combined with HFT, hand blossom thinning (HBT) combined with HFT, and HFT only. Pear trees were divided into 4 groups equally. Four indexes were used to evaluate the test: flower reserve rate, fruit set rate, work efficiency and cost, fruit yield, and quality. Pear canopy was divided into the inner, middle, and outer 3 layers in the top view. 20 inflorescence samples were selected for each layer. Field tests showed: there was no obvious difference in quality between mechanical blossom thinning and HBT, and the working stability of TTBT was higher than other treatments. Mechanical blossom thinning decreased the fruit set rate to a certain degree, but did not reduce the yield and quality of harvesting. TTBT could save 61.35% operation time compared with HFT, and the profitable area was 5845.76 m(2). TTBT is suitable for large-scale sparse layer trunk-type pear orchards. HEBT could save 36.01% operation time compared with HFT, and the profitable area was 663.96 m(2). HEBT is suitable for small and medium-sized trunk-type pear orchards. Blossom thinning can improve the average weight of high quality fruit and brix of sugar solids.

  • 相关文献
作者其他论文 更多>>
置顶
购物车
反馈

© 京ICP备09089781号-29 主办单位：江苏省农业科学院

学术资源： 中国农业科学院 农业专业知识服务系统 农科联盟资源共建共享平台 中国农业科技文献与信息服务平台 中国农业期刊集成服务平台