您好，欢迎访问北京市农林科学院 机构知识库！
北京市农林科学院机构知识库

全部

  • 全部
  • 标题
  • 学者
  • 机构
  • 关键词

Revised photochemical reflectance index (PRI) for predicting light use efficiency of wheat in a growth cycle: validation and comparison

文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Wu, Chaoyang 1 ; Niu, Zheng 1 ; Tang, Quan 1 ; Huang, Wenjiang 1 ;

作者机构： 1.Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Inst Remote Sensing Applicat, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China

2.Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Univ, Beijing 100039, Peoples R China

3.Natl Engn Res Ctr Informat Technol Agr, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China

期刊名称：INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING （ 影响因子：3.151； 五年影响因子：3.266 ）

ISSN： 0143-1161

年卷期： 2010 年 31 卷 11 期

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： The photochemical reflectance index (PRI) was developed to trace the changes in light use efficiency (LUE) as the two contributing reflectances at 531 nm and 570 nm are closely related to the xanthophyll pigment cycle. In this paper, two revised indices of PRI (PRIR1 and PRIR2) are derived for a better prediction of LUE during the growth cycle of wheat. The signal of chlorophyll content (reflectance at 550 nm) to PRI is incorporated so that the revised indices can be used to estimate LUE values at low chlorophyll concentration. A validation was conducted using ground data (reflectance and LUE data) during a growth cycle of wheat in 2007 (17 April, 28 April, 16, 29 May). The results demonstrate that PRI cannot be used as an index for LUE estimation during the growth cycle of wheat as the relationship between PRI and LUE significantly weakened (R2 = 0.20) on 29 May when the leaves lost chlorophyll concentration in the senescent period. PRIR1 and PRIR2 are more robust than PRI for LUE estimationm, not only with a relatively stable precision (R2 = 0.62, 0.76, 0.62, 0.57 for PRIR1 and R2 = 0.62, 0.76, 0.63, 0.59 for PRIR2) but also with better linearity with LUE (standard error of regression equation between LUE and index is 0.00187, 0.00127, 0.00116, 0.00103 for PRIR1 and 0.00186, 0.00117, 0.00114, 0.00102 for PRIR2). The result of the comparison analysis indicates that the revised indices (PRIR1 and PRIR2) are more sensitive than PRI to low chlorophyll content and low leaf area index, which means they are more appropriate for LUE interpretation in these situations. Sensitivity of Sun-sensor geometry to all indices implies that all indices exhibit large variations with changes in solar zenith angle and view zenith angle. As solar zenith angle increases, all indices display different sensitivity patterns before and after hotspot positions. All indices vary greatly as the view zenith angle increases. An acceptable precision of all indices can be acquired within a departure of 10 degrees from the nadir view.

  • 相关文献
作者其他论文 更多>>
置顶
购物车
反馈

© 京ICP备09089781号-29 主办单位：北京市农林科学院

学术资源： 中国农业科学院 农业专业知识服务系统 农科联盟资源共建共享平台 中国农业科技文献与信息服务平台 中国农业期刊集成服务平台