文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： O'Donnell, Michael ¹ ; Dev, Amelia S. ² ; Antonoplis, Stephen ³ ; Baum, Stephen M. ⁴ ; Benedetti, Arianna H. ⁵ ; Br ¹ ;

作者机构： 1.Georgetown Univ, McDonough Sch Business, Washington, DC 20057 USA

2.Univ Miami, Dept Psychol, Miami, FL 33146 USA

3.Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA

4.Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA

5.Airbnb, San Francisco, CA 94103 USA

6.NYU, Coll Arts & Sci, New York, NY 10003 USA

7.Univ Chicago, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA

8.Univ Tubingen, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany

9.NYU, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY 10012 USA

10.McKinsey & Co Inc, Chicago, IL 60601 USA

11.Peking Univ, Sch Psychol & Cognit Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China

关键词： scarcity; reproducibility; open science; meta-analysis; evidentiary value

期刊名称：PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA （ 影响因子：11.205； 五年影响因子：12.291 ）

ISSN： 0027-8424

年卷期： 2021 年 118 卷 44 期

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： Empirical audit and review is an approach to assessing the evidentiary value of a research area. It involves identifying a topic and selecting a cross-section of studies for replication. We apply the method to research on the psychological consequences of scarcity. Starting with the papers citing a seminal publication in the field, we conducted replications of 20 studies that evaluate the role of scarcity priming in pain sensitivity, resource allocation, materialism, and many other domains. There was considerable variability in the replicability, with some strong successes and other undeniable failures. Empirical audit and review does not attempt to assign an overall replication rate for a heterogeneous field, but rather facilitates researchers seeking to incorporate strength of evidence as they refine theories and plan new investigations in the research area. This method allows for an integration of qualitative and quantitative approaches to review and enables the growth of a cumulative science.