您好，欢迎访问吉林省农业科学院 机构知识库！
吉林省农业科学院机构知识库

全部

  • 全部
  • 标题
  • 学者
  • 机构
  • 关键词

Exploring management strategies to improve maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency in northeast China using the DNDC and DSSAT models

文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Jiang, Rong 1 ; He, Wentian 1 ; Zhou, Wei 1 ; Hou, Yunpeng 3 ; Yang, J. Y. 4 ; He, Ping 1 ;

作者机构： 1.CAAS, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, Minist Agr, Key Lab Plant Nutr & Fertilisers, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China

2.Agr & Agri Food Canada, Ottawa Res & Dev Ctr, 960 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada

3.Jilin Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Environm Res, Changchun 130033, Jilin, Peoples R China

4.Agr & Agri Food Canada, Harrow Res & Dev Ctr, Harrow, ON N0R 1G0, Canada

关键词： DNDC model; DSSAT model; Maize growth; Nitrogen use efficiency; Sensitivity analysis

期刊名称：COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE （ 影响因子：5.565； 五年影响因子：5.494 ）

ISSN： 0168-1699

年卷期： 2019 年 166 卷

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： Process-based models are valuable tools for simulating crop production, estimating agronomic efficiency and developing optimum management practices to achieve sustainable agriculture. However, a comparison of the DeNitrification-DeComposition (DNDC) and Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) models has not been previously used to optimize management practices for spring maize in northeast China. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the performance of the DSSAT and DNDC models in simulating maize growth and soil C & N dynamics and analyse their weaknesses and strengths based on a 7-year spring maize study in northeast China; and to explore the optimal management practices for improving maize production and nitrogen use efficiency under 20-year climate variability. Both DNDC and DSSAT exhibited "good" to "excellent" performance in simulating maize yield, above-ground biomass and plant N uptake for ecological intensification with N fertilizer (EI-N) and farmers' practice with N fertilizer (FP-N) treatments based on percent bias (PBIAS) of - 10.5-4.2%, a normalized root mean squared error (nRMSE) of 7.5-17.2%, a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.17-0.77 and a d index of agreement (d) of 0.81-0.94. Both models showed "fair" to "good" performance in the same simulation for EI without N fertilizer (EI-NO) and FP without N fertilizer (FP-NO) treatments, but the maize yield simulation was better for the DSSAT model. In addition, the two models provided "fair" performance for N-fertilized treatments to "poor" performance for N-unfertilized treatments in simulations of soil organic carbon (0-0.20 m) and mineral N (0-0.30 m), but the simulations were better for the DNDC model. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the optimum yield and agronomic efficiency were achieved at a planting date of late April to early May, a fertilizer N application rate of 180-210 kg N ha(-1) with two timing splits in the DNDC and DSSAT model and a planting density of 7 seeds m(-2) in the DSSAT model. This study suggests that comparing the management scenarios of multiple dynamic models is more beneficial to develop best management practices for improving crop production and fertilizer use efficiency.

  • 相关文献
作者其他论文 更多>>
置顶
购物车
反馈

© 京ICP备09089781号-29 主办单位：吉林省农业科学院

学术资源： 中国农业科学院 农业专业知识服务系统 农科联盟资源共建共享平台 中国农业科技文献与信息服务平台 中国农业期刊集成服务平台