您好，欢迎访问北京市农林科学院 机构知识库！
北京市农林科学院机构知识库

全部

  • 全部
  • 标题
  • 学者
  • 机构
  • 关键词

Improving the Performance of Vegetable Leaf Wetness Duration Models in Greenhouses Using Decision Tree Learning

文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Wang, Hui 1 ; Antonio Sanchez-Molina, Jorge 1 ; Li, Ming 2 ; Rodriguez Diaz, Francisco 1 ;

作者机构： 1.Univ Almeria, Dept Informat, CeiA3, CIESOL, Almeria 04120, Spain

2.Minist Agr, Beijing Res Ctr Informat Technol Agr, Natl Engn Res Ctr Informat Technol Agr, Natl Engn Lab Agri Prod Qual Traceabil,Key Lab Ag, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China

关键词： leaf wetness threshold; data classification; data mining technology; dew temperature

期刊名称：WATER （ 影响因子：3.103； 五年影响因子：3.229 ）

ISSN： 2073-4441

年卷期： 2019 年 11 卷 1 期

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： Leaf wetness duration (LWD) is a key driving variable for peat and disease control in greenhouse management, and depends upon irrigation, rainfall, and dewfall. However, LWD measurement is often replaced by its estimation from other meteorological variables, with associated uncertainty due to the modelling approach used and its calibration. This study uses the decision learning tree method (DLT) for calibrating four LWD modelsRH threshold model (RHM), the dew parameterization model (DPM), the classification and regression tree model (CART) and the neural network model (NNM)whose performances in reproducing measured data are assessed using a large dataset. The relative importance of input variables in contributing to LWD estimation is also computed for the models tested. The LWD models were evaluated at two different greenhouse locations: in a Chinese (CN) greenhouse over three planting seasons (April 2014-October 2015) and in a Spanish (ES) greenhouse over four planting seasons (April 2016-February 2018). Based on multi-evaluation indicators, the models were given a ranking for their assessment capabilities during calibration (in the Spanish greenhouse from April 2016 to December 2016 and in the Chinese greenhouse from April 2014 to November 2014). The models were then evaluated on an independent set of data, and the obtained areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the LWD models were over 0.73. Therein, the best LWD model in this case was the NNM, with positive predict values (PPVs) of 0.82 (SP) and 0.90 (CN), and mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 1.85 h (SP) and 1.30 h (CN). Consequently, the DLT can decrease LWD estimation error by calibrating the model threshold and choosing black box model input variables.

  • 相关文献
作者其他论文 更多>>
置顶
购物车
反馈

© 京ICP备09089781号-29 主办单位：北京市农林科学院

学术资源： 中国农业科学院 农业专业知识服务系统 农科联盟资源共建共享平台 中国农业科技文献与信息服务平台 中国农业期刊集成服务平台