文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Riya, S. ¹ ; Zhou, S. ² ; Kobara, Y. ³ ; Sagehashi, M. ⁴ ; Terada, A. ¹ ; Hosomi, M. ¹ ;

作者机构： 1.Tokyo Univ Agr & Technol, Grad Sch Engn, Koganei, Tokyo 1848588, Japan

2.Shanghai Acad Agr Sci, Ecoenvironm Protect Res Inst, Shanghai 201403, Peoples R China

3.Natl Inst Agroenvironm Sci, Div Organochem, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058604, Japan

4.Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth & Collaborat, Wako, Saitama 3510197, Japan

关键词： Greenhouse gas;Rice field;Cattle waste;Topdressing;Material cycling

期刊名称：JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT （ 影响因子：6.789； 五年影响因子：6.914 ）

ISSN：

年卷期：

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： The use of liquid cattle waste (LCW) as a fertilizer for forage rice is important for material recycling because it can promote biomass production, and reduce the use of chemical fertilizer. Meanwhile, increase in emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs), especially CH4 and N2O would be concerned. We conducted a field study to determine the optimum loading rate of LCW as N to promote forage rice growth with lower GHG emissions. The LCW was applied to forage rice fields, N100, N250, N500, and N750, at four different N loading rates of 107, 258, 522, and 786 kg N ha(-1), respectively, including 50 kg N ha(-1) of basal chemical fertilizer. The above-ground biomass yields increased 14.6-18.5 t ha(-1) with increases in N loading rates. During the cultivation period, both the CH4 and N2O fluxes increased with increases in LCW loading rates. In the treatments of N100, N250, N500, and N750, the cumulative CH4 emissions during the entire period, including cultivation and fallow period were 29.6, 18.1, 54.4, and 67.5 kg C ha(-1), respectively, whereas those of N2O were -0.15, -0.02,1.49, and 5.82 kg N ha(-1), respectively. Considering the greenhouse gas emissions and above-ground biomass, the yield-scaled CO2-equivalents (CO2-eqs) were 66.3, 35.9, 161, and 272 kg CO2 t(-1) for N100, N250, N500, and N750, respectively. These results suggest that N250 is the most appropriate LCW loading rate for promoting forage rice production with lower GHG emissions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.