您好，欢迎访问中国水产科学研究院 机构知识库！
中国水产科学研究院机构知识库

全部

  • 全部
  • 标题
  • 学者
  • 机构
  • 关键词

Carbon budgets of two typical polyculture pond systems in coastal China and their potential roles in the global carbon cycle

文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Zhang, Dongxu 1 ; Tian, Xiangli 1 ; Dong, Shuanglin 1 ; Chen, Yan 2 ; Feng, Jie 1 ; He, Rui-Peng 1 ; Zhang, Kai 3 ;

作者机构： 1.Ocean Univ China, Minist Educ, Key Lab Mariculture, Qingdao 266003, Peoples R China

2.Beijing Aquat Prod Technol Promot Dept, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China

3.Chinese Acad Fishery Sci, Pearl River Fisheries Res Inst, Guangzhou 510380, Peoples R China

关键词： Polyculture; Carbon budget; Clam farming; Global warming potential; Carbon sink/source function

期刊名称：AQUACULTURE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS （ 影响因子：3.074； 五年影响因子：3.475 ）

ISSN： 1869-215X

年卷期： 2020 年 12 卷

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： The role of aquaculture systems in the global carbon cycle is poorly understood to date. We investigated the carbon budgets in 2 polyculture systems (PM: swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus with kuruma shrimp Marsupenaeus japonicus; and PMR: crab, shrimp and shortnecked clam Ruditapes philippinarum) during the farming season (125 d in total). The main carbon input occurred via water (PM: 55.06%; PMR: 62.50%), followed by that via feed. PM absorbed 21.55 g C m(-2) across the air-water interface, accounting for 13.27% of the total input. The carbon output via water was the main output in both PM (89.17 %) and PMR (46.43%). PMR emitted 53.00 g C m(-2) into the atmosphere during the farming season, accounting for 32.53% of the total output. The carbon output by harvested animals in PMR accounted for 19.48% of the total output, which was much higher than that in PM (5.71 %). Carbon accumulation in the sediment was significantly higher in PM than in PMR (p < 0.05), but the value of both represented a small portion of the total output. Clam farming in the polyculture system profoundly altered the carbon budgets by changing the CO2 flux direction, reducing carbon accumulation in water and sediments and increasing the carbon output by harvested animals. In terms of the global warming potential, which was calculated from the results of CO2 and CH4 fluxes across the air-water interface, PM had the potential for mitigating the greenhouse effect on the 20 yr horizon, whereas PMR exacerbated global warming. Our results suggest that PM acted as a net carbon sink in the global carbon cycle, while PMR acted as a carbon source.

  • 相关文献
作者其他论文 更多>>
置顶
购物车
反馈

© 京ICP备09089781号-29 主办单位：中国水产科学研究院

学术资源： 中国农业科学院 农业专业知识服务系统 农科联盟资源共建共享平台 中国农业科技文献与信息服务平台 中国农业期刊集成服务平台