您好，欢迎访问中国水产科学研究院 机构知识库！
中国水产科学研究院机构知识库

全部

  • 全部
  • 标题
  • 学者
  • 机构
  • 关键词

Assessment of the benthic ecological quality status (EcoQs) of Laizhou Bay (China) with an integrated AMBI, M-AMBI, BENTIX, BO2A and feeding evenness index

文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Dong, Jian-Yu 1 ; Wang, Xuefeng 1 ; Bidegain, Gorka 5 ; Sun, Xin 3 ; Bian, Xiaodong 4 ; Zhang, Xiumei 2 ;

作者机构： 1.Guangdong Ocean Univ, Fisheries Coll, Zhanjiang 524088, Peoples R China

2.Zhejiang Ocean Univ, Fisheries Coll, Zhoushan 316022, Peoples R China

3.Ocean Univ China, Key Lab Mariculture, Minist Educ, Qingdao 266003, Peoples R China

4.Chinese Acad Fishery Sci, Yellow Sea Fisheries Res Inst, Qingdao 266071, Peoples R China

5.Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Engn Sch Bilbao, Dept Appl Math, Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo 1, Bilbao 48013, Spain

6.Univ Basque Country PiE UPV EHU, Res Ctr Expt Marine Biol & Biotechnol, Plentzia Marine Stn, Plentzia 48620, Spain

7.Guangdong Prov Far Sea Fisheries Management & Fish, Zhanjiang, Peoples R China

关键词： Ecological quality status; Biotic index; Macrobenthos; Benthic assemblage; Disturbance

期刊名称：ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS （ 影响因子：6.9； 五年影响因子：6.6 ）

ISSN： 1470-160X

年卷期： 2023 年 153 卷

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： With increasing impacts of climate change and human activities on marine ecosystems, accurate assessment of benthic ecological quality status (EcoQs) has become increasingly important for ecosystem management and restoration. Here, we used five macrobenthos-based biotic indices (the AZTI marine biotic index (AMBI), multivariate AZTI marine biotic index (M-AMBI), benthic index (BENTIX), benthic opportunistic annelid amphipod index (BO2A) and feeding evenness index (jFD)) to assess the EcoQs of Laizhou Bay in Bohai Sea, China, and examine the consistency among indices. The five biotic indices were then combined and integrated in a composite index to assess the benthic EcoQs of Laizhou Bay, and determine which areas had acceptable or unacceptable EcoQs. The EcoQs of Laizhou Bay differed depending on the selected index, and the agreement among indices was low according to Kappa analysis. AMBI and BO2A indicated that the EcoQs of all sampled stations in Laizhou Bay were acceptable, whereas M-AMBI, BENTIX and jFD indicated that the stations with acceptable EcoQs accounted for 69.56%, 82.61% and 52.1%, respectively. The final EcoQs based on a composite of the five biotic indices indicated that 83.78% of the total study area of Laizhou Bay was acceptable, while the unacceptable areas were distributed mainly in the estuarine area (e.g., Xiaoqing River and Mi River). Moreover, all five biotic indices and four species diversity indices (richness, Shannon, Simpson and Pielou indices) indicated that the area with acceptable EcoQs showed higher values than the area with unacceptable EcoQs. The functional diversity indices (FRic, FDis and RaoQ) also showed significantly higher values in acceptable than unacceptable areas. We argue that the use of our composite index combining multiple indices to assess benthic ecological quality yields more accurate results than the use of individual indices, and additionally provides valuable information for ecosystem management.

  • 相关文献
作者其他论文 更多>>
置顶
购物车
反馈

© 京ICP备09089781号-29 主办单位：中国水产科学研究院

学术资源： 中国农业科学院 农业专业知识服务系统 农科联盟资源共建共享平台 中国农业科技文献与信息服务平台 中国农业期刊集成服务平台