文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Zhang, Yanjun ¹ ; Zou, Junliang ² ; Osborne, Bruce ³ ; Dang, Wei ⁴ ; Xu, Yuxia ¹ ; Ren, Yuanyuan ¹ ; Dang, Shuina ¹ ; Wang, Lijuan ⁵ ; Chen, Xi ¹ ; Yu, Yuan ¹ ;

作者机构： 1.Baoji Univ Arts & Sci, Geog & Environm Engn Dept, Baoji 721013, Peoples R China

2.Beijing Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Beijing Res & Dev Ctr Grass & Environm, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China

3.Univ Coll Dublin UCD, UCD Earth Inst, UCD Sch Biol & Environm Sci, Dublin 4, Ireland

4.Shaanxi Miaosen Environm Protect Technol Co Ltd, Xian 710000, Peoples R China

5.Fengxian Soil & Water Conservat Workstat, Baoji 721700, Peoples R China

关键词： Soil respiration; meta -analysis; Conventional tillage; Straw return

期刊名称：ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING （ 影响因子：3.8； 五年影响因子：4.3 ）

ISSN： 0925-8574

年卷期： 2023 年 196 卷

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： In agroecosystems, straw return is considered an important agricultural management practice influencing soil respiration. However, the impact of straw return on soil respiration is equivocal and the underlying mechanisms underpinning any responses remain unclear. To address this, we synthesized 86 recently published papers on dryland agroecosystems in China, which comprise approximately 74% of the agricultural land area, using a metaanalysis approach and explored the influence of straw return on soil respiration and the underlying mechanisms involved. Straw return resulted in a 13.5% increase in soil respiration, a 9.4% increase in soil moisture, a 10.4% increase in crop yield, a 18.9% increase in SOC (soil organic carbon), and a 2.6% decrease in soil temperature. Compared to conventional tillage without straw return treatment, the increase in soil respiration in response to straw return was closely related to modifications in soil temperature, soil moisture, SOC, and crop yield (P < 0.05). The contribution of the different drivers to increases in soil respiration in response to straw return showed a trend of crop yield > soil temperature > SOC > soil moisture. In addition, straw mulching, crop planting system, tillage method, and fertilization modified the effect of straw return on soil respiration. The increase in soil respiration was less when straw was used as a mulch (12.9%), compared to when it was incorporated into the soil (18.8%). The cropping system also influenced the effect of straw return on soil respiration and was increased by 21.1% in inter-crops, and by 17.3% and 11.0% in monocultures and rotations treatments, respectively. Our results also showed that the effect of straw return on soil respiration was larger in deep tillage treatments than in shallow tillage treatments (26.9% vs.18.7%). In addition, the effect of straw return on soil respiration was also larger in fertilized treatment compared to unfertilized one (12.7% vs. 0.5%). However, this depended on the amount of nitrogen fertilizer applied rates and was higher (14.8%) with low (<300 kg ha(-1)) application rates compared to high (>= 300 kg ha(-1)) ones (2.5%). Therefore, in dryland agroecosystems in China, biological factors, especially those related to crop yield, may be a more important factor regulating the effect of straw return on soil respiration. However, straw mulching, crop planting system, tillage method, and fertilization can modify the effect of straw return on soil respiration.